Congress MP Renuka Chowdhury Served Privilege Notice Over Parliament Dog Entry

Congress Rajya Sabha MP Renuka Chowdhury has been served a breach of privilege notice after a controversy erupted over her bringing a rescued stray dog into the Parliament complex and allegedly making derogatory remarks about fellow lawmakers. The complaint stems from an incident during the Winter Session on December 1 and has sparked debate over parliamentary decorum , security protocols , and animal welfare .

The complaint was submitted by BJP MPs Brij Lal and Indu Bala Goswami under Rule 188 of the Rajya Sabha procedures, which allows members to raise questions of privilege if the dignity or functioning of the House is undermined. The Rajya Sabha Chairman referred the matter to the Committee of Privileges , which has asked Chowdhury to submit her written response by February 23 .

The row began when some MPs objected to the presence of the dog inside the complex. Chowdhury reportedly responded that “those sitting inside bite, dogs don’t,” a remark the complainants described as contemptuous and defamatory toward elected representatives. They also alleged that bringing an unverified animal into a high-security zone constituted a violation of established security norms.

Parliament House operates under stringent security procedures, and unauthorized animals are not permitted due to health, safety and security considerations. Officials stress that compliance with these protocols is essential given the complex’s sensitive status.

Chowdhury, known for her advocacy of animal welfare , defended her actions, stating she rescued the stray while travelling to Parliament and intended to send it for veterinary care . She questioned the objections, saying there is no law against rescuing a stray animal, and accused critics of lacking compassion. When asked about the notice, she told reporters, “Bhow bhow… what else should I say?”, a remark that intensified media attention.

A privilege motion is invoked when the rights, authority or dignity of Parliament or its members are believed to have been violated. If a breach is established, the panel may recommend an apology , reprimand , or other action.

The committee will review Chowdhury’s response before deciding whether further action is warranted.